Wednesday, May 28, 2025

Impact of HIV on Liver Stiffness Post-HCV Cure | HIV-HCV Co-infection Insights



INTRODUCTION ๐Ÿ“˜

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection continues to pose a substantial health burden, especially in populations co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The advent of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has revolutionized treatment outcomes, allowing a majority of patients to achieve sustained virological response (SVR). A notable consequence of SVR is the gradual regression of liver fibrosis, often tracked through reductions in liver stiffness (LS) measurements. However, the trajectory of LS in patients with advanced fibrosis, particularly those with HIV co-infection, remains insufficiently characterized. This prospective study, conducted within the GEHEP-011 multicenter cohort, aims to elucidate the differential LS dynamics following HCV cure, with a specific focus on the role of HIV co-infection. By leveraging longitudinal LS measurements and robust statistical modeling, the study seeks to fill a critical knowledge gap that may influence future monitoring and management of co-infected individuals.

COHORT PROFILE AND STUDY DESIGN ๐Ÿงช

The GEHEP-011 study was designed as a large-scale, prospective, multicenter cohort initiated in October 2011 and extending to November 2023. It included 1,138 patients with chronic HCV infection, both with and without HIV co-infection. Eligibility criteria were stringent: all participants achieved SVR through DAA therapy, had a baseline liver stiffness value of at least 9.5 kPa, and underwent follow-up LS assessments post-treatment. The study's longitudinal design enabled annual evaluations of LS, providing a dynamic view of fibrosis regression over time. This structured follow-up allowed researchers to accurately assess the timeline and frequency of LS normalization, defined as two consecutive measurements ≤7.2 kPa, a threshold considered indicative of minimal or no fibrosis.

IMPACT OF HIV CO-INFECTION ON LIVER STIFFNESS ๐Ÿงฌ

A central finding of the study was the significant difference in LS normalization between patients with HCV mono-infection and those co-infected with HIV. Despite all patients achieving SVR, only 32% of people living with HIV (PLWH) reached LS normalization, compared to 37% among mono-infected individuals. The analysis suggests that HIV may independently hinder the regression of liver fibrosis even after viral eradication. This observation persisted even after adjusting for other clinical variables, including diabetes and pre-treatment liver damage. The influence of HIV on fibrotic processes could stem from ongoing immune activation, residual inflammation, or altered liver regeneration capacity, pointing to a biological interplay that merits further investigation.

PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING AND STATISTICAL VALIDITY ๐Ÿ“Š

To mitigate potential confounding factors, the researchers implemented a rigorous statistical approach using propensity score (PS) matching. By accounting for baseline differences between PLWH and mono-infected patients, PS matching ensured a more balanced comparison group. The results held firm even after matching—PLWH continued to show a significantly lower likelihood of LS normalization. In a multivariate competing risks model, where death was treated as a competing event, HIV infection emerged as a statistically significant negative predictor of normalization (sub-hazard ratio = 0.82, p = 0.045). Further PS-matched analysis yielded an even stronger association (sHR = 0.76, p < 0.001), reinforcing the robustness and reproducibility of the findings.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS FOR LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT ๐Ÿฅ

The diminished probability of LS normalization in PLWH raises critical questions about their long-term liver health, even after successful HCV treatment. Persistent liver stiffness may predispose this population to an elevated risk of hepatic complications, including cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver-related mortality. These findings underline the importance of continued liver monitoring in co-infected individuals and may advocate for extended surveillance protocols. Furthermore, the study highlights a need for targeted interventions or adjunctive therapies that can specifically address the slower fibrosis regression observed in PLWH, aiming to equalize health outcomes across patient populations.

FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS ๐Ÿ”ฌ

This study opens several avenues for future research. Investigations into the underlying biological mechanisms by which HIV influences liver stiffness regression are urgently needed. Studies could explore molecular markers of fibrosis, immune activation profiles, or the role of HIV-related treatments in fibrogenesis. Additionally, expanding research into other co-factors such as alcohol use, metabolic syndrome, or gut microbiota may provide a more comprehensive understanding of fibrosis dynamics. Longitudinal studies with biopsy correlation could also help validate LS as a surrogate marker of histological improvement. Ultimately, multidisciplinary research combining hepatology, infectious disease, and immunology will be essential in crafting holistic care models for co-infected populations.


 ๐Ÿ‘‰ Visit: https://infectious-diseases-conferences.pencis.com

๐Ÿ“ข Nominate Now: https://z-i.me/abd

๐Ÿ“ Register: https://infectious-diseases-conferences.pencis.com/award-registration/

๐Ÿ“ฉ Contact us: infectious@pencis.com


Hashtags

#HCV #HIV #Coinfection #LiverFibrosis #LiverStiffness #SVR #DAATherapy #FibrosisRegression #GEHEP011 #ChronicHCV #Hepatology #HIVResearch #FibrosisBiomarkers #PublicHealth #LiverHealth #PropensityScore #ClinicalResearch #FibrosisMonitoring #LiverDisease #HCVCure

No comments:

Post a Comment

Solving Fractal–Fractional Optimal Control with Caputo–Fabrizio Derivatives | #ControlParametrization #Pencis

  INTRODUCTION ๐Ÿ” Fractal–fractional derivatives have emerged as powerful tools in mathematical modeling, allowing for a nuanced description...